Misled Singaporeans About The Conclusion Of The AGO Audit Report On AHPETC

How can so many lawyers in WP not understand the conclusion drawn by the AG in the Auditor Report?

One can only conclude that it was a deliberate attempt to mislead.

The conclusion of the Audit Report is that UNLESS the weaknesses highlighted are addressed, there can be:

- NO ASSURANCE that AHPETC's financial statements are ACCURATE and RELIABLE;

- NO ASSURANCE that public funds are PROPERLY SPENT, ACCOUNTED FOR AND MANAGED.

How does one reach the conclusion that no money is missing when you cannot be certain that the accounts are accurate and reliable?

How can one be assured that there is no criminal or dishonest activity when there is no assurance that public funds are properly managed, spent and accounted for?